Vetting

We accept three engineers out of every hundred.

Judged by active CTOs on real production cases: architecture, code under review, communication, references and effective AI use.

THE PROBLEM

What production engineering actually requires

What our vetting is built to measure, each one tested on real, production-grade work.

Real production scenarios

We evaluate the work your product depends on — maintaining an API that handles 50,000 requests per hour, not solving a graph puzzle in 45 minutes. Different skills, and we test the one that ships.

Evaluated by active CTOs

An active CTO can assess whether an architecture decision is sound or a mistake that will cost months — judgment a keyword screen can't reach.

Built for remote delivery

Remote delivery runs on communication, documentation, and autonomy — so we test exactly those, on real async scenarios.

AI proficiency, measured

Across our engagements, an engineer fluent in AI tools delivers 30–40% faster. We measure that fluency directly, applied to real engineering tasks.

WHAT WE MEASURE

How we evaluate: the rubric active CTOs designed

A system sketched on a whiteboard: architecture and design

Architecture and system design

Real scenarios with real constraints: scale, budget, team size, existing technical debt. We evaluate reasoning about trade-offs and the ability to communicate technical decisions to non-technical stakeholders.

What we look for:Do they ask about constraints before proposing solutions?
Red flag:Candidates who have 'the right solution' without knowing the context.
Clean code on screen: quality and craftsmanship

Code quality and craftsmanship

We review the candidate's real code — something built in production, not an interview exercise. We look at clean structure, error handling, testing discipline, separation of concerns, and readability.

What we look for:Code that another senior can understand and extend without asking.
Red flag:Missing tests, God objects, business logic in controllers.
Abstract neural network: AI competency

AI competency

We evaluate effective use of GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude, and similar tools. Prompt engineering applied to real engineering tasks. And most importantly: judgment for knowing when AI output needs human review.

What we look for:AI as a multiplier, not as a substitute for critical thinking.
Red flag:Copying output without understanding it. Or rejecting tools on principle.
Engineer on a remote video call

Communication and remote collaboration

Written clarity, verbal fluency, ability to raise issues proactively, and timezone discipline. Remote work doesn't fail due to lack of technical skill — it fails when communication breaks down.

What we look for:Someone who flags a blocker before it becomes a delay.
Red flag:PRs without descriptions, monosyllabic replies, prolonged silence.
Reviewing a track record on paper

Verified professional track record

Employment verification, real professional references, and cultural alignment with startup and scale-up environments. We look for engineers who have worked on products with real users.

What we look for:Verifiable track record of delivery in agile environments under real pressure.
Red flag:CVs that can't be verified, experience exclusively in projects without users.

THE FUNNEL

From 100 candidates to 3 validated engineers

Each stage eliminates profiles that don't fit — not people, but profiles that couldn't deliver in the context of our clients.

1

Total applications

100% of candidates enter the process.

2

CV + portfolio

40% pass. Initial screening of experience, stack, and production work.

3

Remote communication

20% pass. Written clarity, verbal fluency, timezone discipline.

4

Live technical evaluation

12% pass. Pair programming with an active CTO on real problems.

5

Verification and references

10% pass. Employment history, confirmed professional references.

6

Validated in network

Final 3%. Ready to deploy on client projects.

0%

final acceptance rate

A candidate reasoning through a system design at the whiteboard

Want to see the caliber of engineers who pass this process?

Tell us what your task needs. In 72 hours we assign vetted profiles to it — each with its evaluation report included.